The three Facebooks

I recently wanted to check the upcoming gigs of a music venue. I tried to pull up their website¹, but I couldn't find their agenda there - turned out it's sort of an abandoned site, because the hosting company is refusing to respond to any requests.

As a result their gigs are listed on Facebook - at least it can be access without logging in. My current browser setup is a bit complex, but the bottom line is I'm routing my Firefox through my home broadband. I'm used to very fast, unlimited desktop connections these days, both at work and at home, but the throttling I introduced by going through a few loops made some problem visible. When I loaded the Facebook page itself, it took quite a long while, even with noscript and ublock origin, and it made me curious, why.

So I made a fresh Firefox profile and loaded all three versions of Facebook I'm aware of.

Desktop

Visiting the main Facebook site from a regular desktop client gives you the whole, full-blown, unfiltered experience - and the raw madness behind it.

The page executed 26.13 MB Javascript. That is 315x the size of the complete jquery framework, 193x of Bootstrap + Popper + Jquery together.

facebook_normal — Facebook in full glory mode

facebook_normal_js — Facebook and it's Javascript

m.facebook.com

.m is for mobile devices only; without faking my resolution and user agent in Firefox dev tools, I couldn't get there.

It's better, but it still had 1.28 MB Javascript in the end. On mobile, that is a serious amount of code to be executed.

facebook_m — Facebook in mobile mode - strictly for mobile only though

mbasic.facebook.com

mbasic is a fascinating thing: it doesn't have JS at all. It's like the glorious, old days: ugly, very hard to find anything, but incredibly fast and light.

facebook_mbasic — Facebook in good ol' days mode

Summary

	desktop²	m.³	mbasic.⁴
Uncompressed everything	36.83 MB	2.22 MB	96.91 KB
Total used bandwidth	9.33 MB	1.01 MB	57.98 KB
JS code to execute	26.13 MB	1.28 MB	n/a
JS bandwidth	4.22 MB	364.39 KB	n/a
JS compression ratio	6.19x	3.59x	1.67x
CSS to parse	1.34 MB	232.81 KB	inline
CSS bandwidth	279.73 KB	53.61 KB	inline
CSS compression ratio	4.90x	4.34x	-
HTML to parse	2.78 MB	172.06 KB	70.20 KB
HTML bandwith	199.73 KB	37.73 KB	14.20 KB
HTML compression ratio	14.25x	4.56x	4.94x

Conclusions

React is evil. It splits code up into small chunks, and on their own, they seem reasonably sized. However, when there's a myriad of these, they add up.

The compressed vs uncompressed ratio in desktop JS and HTML indicates extreme amount of repetition.

Most resources are unique, hashed names, and I'm guessing many of them are tied to A/B testing or something similar, so caching won't solve the issue either.

There's always a balanced way to do things. A couple of years ago, during the times of backbone.js an underscore.js, that balance was found, and everyone should learn from it.

Many moons ago, in 2012 (when Facebook still had an API), an article was published: The Making of Fastbook: An HTML5 Love Story⁵. It was a demonstration that the already bloated Facebook app could be replaced with a responsive, small, service worker powered HTML5 website.

Facebook won't change: it will keep being a monster on every level.

Don't follow their example.